Criterion-level evidence, scoring rationale, and reviewer calibration.
Interviews built around evidence, not guesswork.
Design structured assessments, guide candidates through reliable browser interviews, and give reviewers the context to make defensible decisions.
Reviewer noteRecommendation supported by cited evidence.
Consistent questions and criteria without flattening candidate nuance.
Reviewers can inspect the evidence behind every consequential signal.
Overrides, exceptions, and final outcomes remain visible and attributable.
A complete interview record, built as the work happens.
No reconstructed audit trail. Plans, consent, responses, evidence, reviewer notes, and overrides stay connected from the first invitation onward.
- 01
Design the signal
Turn a role into a structured question plan, calibrated rubric, and review policy.
- 02
Run a guided interview
Give every candidate a clear, accessible experience with explicit consent and recovery paths.
- 03
Trace every score
Connect criterion scores to the exact transcript, media, and integrity evidence behind them.
- 04
Keep judgment human
Route exceptions to reviewers, record overrides, and preserve the rationale for each decision.
More automation should create more accountability.
Evalnix separates assessment evidence from integrity signals and keeps both reviewable. The result is faster evaluation without hiding uncertainty behind a single score.
Platform administrationPolicy-driven signals shown separately for proportionate human review.